2012年11月14日星期三

TIME's three big cheat


TIME's three big cheat

"China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • 149

Translator:God has eyes

Subjectively, I do not think the world history
library, "said TIME without knowledge Ming,
although Hitler is TIME's regulars. Speaking
TIME good and evil, regardless of the notorious
villains included into the TIME 100 absurdity. To
blame can only blame the founder originally laid
down in the rules of the game is not.
TIME should seem to believe from the conduct of
the Western world: solid, regardless of good and
evil. But not The otherwise good, distorted into
evil; whitewash the villains into heroes. Both
media conscience, adhering to the philosophy of
life or Westerners are not allowed to TIME
reversing black and white, fraud, right?
The fact it only selected for the TIME 100
Chinese characters Chen Guangcheng, Han, Ai
Weiwei see, TIME has completely lost the
concept of "universal value" of the Westerners,
even a man of moral bottom line fall. TIME
nonsensical, abruptly the three liar packaging
has become rare superhero of human society.
2006, TIME100 Shandong Linyi Chen
Guangcheng, which included, at the same time
into the column along with Premier Wen Jiabao.
Chen Guangcheng is a liar, is a "fake" (For
related information, see Gu Xiaojun, Shi
Sansheng etc. questioned the the Chen
Guangcheng series). Is now well known, even
love Chen blind the Times, and presumably also
well aware. Year, Chen blind so can finalists
plotted is the Time magazine? Blind Chen not
be said to be in Beijing to accept an interview
with Time magazine reporter, Linyi authorities
arrested go back to it? The Times reporter ye
then Mentally it? Chen blind Speaking of that
experience caught, I'll be direct license plate
number is visible not only visible, also in black
and white written article. This will not TIME
reporter is blind, right?
When it comes to the heroic deeds of Chen
blind, even riding horse crap: TIME's reporter
Hannah beech TIME 100: The People Who the
Shape Our World "Chen Guangcheng: A Blind
Man with Legal Vision" says: "He may have lost
his sight as a child but Chen, Guangcheng's
legal vision has helped illuminate the plight of
thousands of Chinese villagers. "Lian Chan blind
himself acknowledged his rights in Linyi
experience not only did not change the status
quo, but angered the government more
intensified. TIME This is not clear in fraud,
forgery Chen blind hero performance?
TIME whether it should be a thorough
investigation to see if those who contact the
reporter Chan blind be bought, bribed? If it is
not private transactions, reporters what for the
Chan blind forgery of history?
In 2010, selected the TIME 100, the Chinese Han
Bo Xilai. Needless to say, TIME deliberately Han
Han and Bo Xilai, the same column with Chen
Guangcheng, Ai Weiwei and Wen Jiabao, Xi
Jinping, the same list of similar meaning.
TIME is really a fraud expert, reversing black and
white recidivist. TIME says: "the first novel
written by Han experience according to their
secondary school dropout to become the best-
selling book, and triggered a debate about
stereotyped rigid education system in China."
Han's first "popular" book, should be "triple
door, right? "Triple gate", others Han admitted
that the school wrote. Ye also into the "based on
the experience of their own high school dropout
wrote it? Do Americans even in the past, the
present, the future could not tell it?
TIME idiots in the end can not get to know the
meaning of the word "dropout"? Even this to be
false, let alone others.
2011, selected the TIME 100, Ai Weiwei and
China's Vice President Xi Jinping.
Said: "Ai Weiwei perspective and vision has
become a kind of any nation should be cited to
the proud figure, he will be the world's attention
in the U.S. Ambassador to China Jon Huntsman
in writing for the" Times "Ai Weiwei Profile
attracted to the vitality of modern Chinese
culture. "
Huntsman is a jerk, no doubt. Year, jasmine
incident, he mysteriously appear in Wangfujing
gathering around, of course, is not just to watch
so simple, he is in his own "American masters"
identity "a mortal scam weight to increase. In
other words, in fact, is to help the parties
concerned in the side to catch a big fish, side
took the opportunity to bigger. Its true
intention, he connived daughter and thin guagua
dating insight or two, not painstakingly clever
arrangements, how thin guagua clever'll Hung
Ying-ying of?
Really is a dog bark to. Ai Weiwei's "perspective
and vision" so it really should be no nation takes
pride. When he was in the United States,
Americans are blind or Jin Xiang Yu did not
know? What is modern Chinese culture? Relying
on his middle finger dry Tiananmen Square, with
his mud horse song? Yes, Jon Huntsman so fond
of him, had Ai is not 81 days / dog / day / how
did his running around shouting about? Do
early learned that Ai was not missing a play
about the party directed?
I do not know Ai Weiwei was selected, is TIME
own choice, or Jon Huntsman recommend the
credit? Republicans Smith's pet Chen blind,
Republican Jon Huntsman love Ai Weiwei became
a TIME100 figure, the middle should be no
connection right? Huntsman automatically exit
the presidential campaign, Romney presidential
election defeat, whether Republicans keen to
deceive it? TIME also tend Republicans, does
that mean he is also the most liar tacit media?
The Chinese netizens wave heart Projection "TO
TIME: also said China's road to democracy and
the future", again persuade: TIME will not
conscience make funeral; TIME can help how
many people truly love just yearning for
democracy earned as much right to speak.
Honest, Shi Sansheng more I understand TIME
past, the more he is no longer TIME harbor any
illusions. As Mr. Gu Xiaojun said: "the United
States, human society has done a lot of good."
Emancipation Proclamation ", is a landmark in
the history of human society literature. Again,
after the victory in World War II, the United
States does not require colonies, led to
colonialism complete collapse "to prove that the
United States used to be on behalf of" justice ".
However this moment was, and now the United
States has no interest in the eyes can not.
Driven by the interests, from foster Liu invincible
to cultivation Han, Ai Weiwei, Chen Guangcheng,
both are doing the work contrary to the
expectations of the people of China from the
United States that has a universal value.
What is the feeling of TIME, Shi Sansheng right
or wrong? Do you also remnants of any
conscience at all ready to grant TIME crown to
China's greatest thinkers, Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
founder of the populist democracy?

[Shi Sansheng Wednesday, November 14, 2012 07:31 China]

Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻


Foreign Policy的抉择装瞎或装傻
《中国网络民评官百人团》石三生  九州评论·之一百四十

世人都看得出:大思想家顾晓军先生的《Foreign Policy怎么办?》是在调侃,调侃自己,也调侃Foreign Policy

TOP 100,顾先生自是可进可不进。因为十八大之后,此一场“三千年未有之大变局”自会让顾晓军先生的思想牛刀小试,随着九改七的神话、预测七常委等一一验证,“大思想家”的名声将不胫而走。有了Foreign Policy的认可,无非是锦上添花,不值得欣喜;没有Foreign Policy的认可, “顾晓军主义”也必将以因其紧把中国社会之脉搏,理论上高瞻远瞩、现实中务实可行而彪炳青史。

毫无疑问,此一场变局当真是《学习时报》所说的“三千年未有之大变局”。则顾晓军先生就必将成为“三千年未有”之大思想家。

而于Foreign Policy2012TOP100的遴选将关系到在政改之后的中国是否还有影响力?继续用一些阿斗们滥竽充数,除了让世人耻笑。更只会证明了自己其实就是一份娱乐化的刊物,其“思想必将遭到大治之后的中国有识之士的共唾弃。

真可谓是一招不慎,满盘皆输。当真Foreign Policy 的老东家就是卡内基基金会(见无民主之《论<外交政策>的出版商》),而且还以什么“探讨与中国有关的一系列问题。中国项目研究重点是中国的民主与法制建设、经济改革、以及经济发展和政治改革之间的重要关系”为噱头。竟然未能在此场“三千年未有之大变局”中分一杯羹,甚至还帮了倒忙。就算中国人民不计较,Foreign Policy 自己也会无地自容的吧?

知道徐庶为什么不再说话了吗?非为只恨曹操,更恨诸葛亮耳。以徐庶才高八斗,自然不会愚蠢到不懂得如何区分敌、我的矛盾,兵荒马乱之时,无论敌人如何卑鄙,都是可以理解的不是。唯独这来自同盟军、亲友的暗算,才足以令人肝肠寸断、无言以对。徐庶选择了不再说话,其实就是不再为曹、刘两家任何一家说话。他恨诸葛亮,但难却故主刘备知遇之情;他恨曹操,又实在没有义理可启齿。于是,就只好闭上了鸟嘴。

那徐庶羞愧难当,只能选择闭嘴。好办:老娘一死,他就一孤家寡人的单身汉了不是?一人吃饱了全家不饿。可Foreign Policy 怎么办呢?不养“老娘”卡内基基金会了,总不能把自己的孩子TOP100都统统扼杀了吧?或者,也学默多克,窃听丑闻一起,就干脆自己关闭了《News of the World》一样,Foreign Policy 也自行取缔“中国项目研究”?完全退出中国这个大市场?

难!估计今年的TOP 100,肯定是难产。以Foreign Policy 身居自由世界的耳目,当然不会比顾晓军先生更孤陋寡闻。“顾晓军最新闻”所说的海外《新一代御用文人千人工程曝光》,Foreign Policy 不会不知道吧?如果那什么韩寒、艾未未之流都是出于那“千人工程”,这可怎么是好?思想家也能批量生产,Foreign Policy 还真把自己当成比上帝还能的主儿?人家上帝,也是只管造人,不敢造思想家不是。

当然了,虽然左右为难,无法选择。但于Foreign Policy 毕竟还不至于想不开,学徐庶、学默多克。石三生我有一计可供Foreign Policy参考:

就将那再次倡议政改必须“摸着石头过河”的房某滥竽充数亦不失为妙计。很显然,摸着石头过河,其实就跟欧议会主席学陈瞎子戴墨镜装瞎是一个道理。有眼不用,只管摸,既是对自己两手的自信,更是形象地展示了人类社会从站起来学会思考,复到放弃思考、重新重视四肢运动的严重退化。

既然进化是思想;退化当然也是思想不是?

Foreign Policy 呀,你们千万别辜负了石三生我的这一妙计喲!可能你们老外不知道,俺们中国人都知道:那司马家族之所以能成就以晋代魏的千秋大业,那不都是因为司马懿老儿装疯卖傻立下的头功吗。

要么就戴上墨镜---装瞎!

要么就放弃思想---装傻!

说不定,Foreign Policy就此也可躲过这“三千年未有”之浩劫,来个自摸满堂红呢。

【石三生 2012115日星期一 06:04 中国】

2011年3月18日星期五

工信部建议维权,中国联通还在狐疑


工信部建议维权,中国联通还在犹豫
《中国网络民评官百人团》:石三生
虽然被博客中国毫无道理地扫地出门,但有时还是会回去走马观花一番。看到甜夏的《世上最痛苦:辐射来了,盐没了!》一文,跟了一贴:“官民的逆向互动思维已经形成,说啥都是扯淡。我亲戚在东北一边远小城,今天路过盐业公司,警察把路都封了,说怕老百姓抢购盐!我听了想笑笑不出来。该去责怪谁呢?老百姓傻逼?还是政府……”。可能是最后一句话犯了忌,吓得编辑立刻给遮挡起来了。是啥话呢?不过是“看到核专家又在说中国的核安全可以抵抗万年一遇的地震。感觉这真不是个人待的国家。”这本来是一个石氏式的幽默,仿的是某朝某诗人给财主妈祝寿时的韵味:“你的老娘不是人,原是王母下凡尘。”多好的一个幽默?石三生只是没把下半句说出来而已。怎么就没人懂了呢?都胡乱想个啥呢?
这难得幽默了一把,弄了个自讨没趣。就又想起自己最近正在维权的一件事,一点都不幽默的对话,那中国联通的客服代表却分明干笑了几声。这还真是他爷爷的颠三倒四的让人摸不着头脑:到底是谁的脑子有点错筋了呢?
因为联通无线上网卡的虚假广告问题,我从大年初三就开始不停地网上、电话上的投诉,因涉及吉林、山东两省,在10010中和客服代表又总是纠缠不清,就把问题详细地投诉在了联通的网站上。自觉虽然文采差了点,但表述的投诉问题应该足够明确。就这,他们竟然还是搞不明白。每次找我落实问题的时候,还在纠缠你上网了多少时间,每兆是多少钱等等。最后实在忍不住,我就说:“你吃过包子吧?卖包子的明明标着纯肉包子2元钱一个,你付了2元钱,买回家美滋滋的一口下去,竟然是个白菜包子,而白菜包子价格是5毛钱。你会怎么想?这叫骗人!懂不懂?意思就说是你们联通涉嫌欺诈,是个大骗子!明白不?”短暂的沉默,那女代表终于咯咯的干笑了几声,答应再继续往上汇报。
本来就很简单的问题,我就搞不懂这联通的理解能力咋就这么弱呢?非得要人家说出你是个大骗子来才恍然大悟?也真佩服那些客服代表的本事,就这样,还不忘微笑服务。
虽然这联通好脾气,笑纳了我的大骗子美誉。但问题却迟迟得不到解决,本来是不想跟全国人民一起傻逼似的凑315闹剧的。可联通因害怕我投诉,竟然怕到关闭了自己的网上投诉平台。我也只好假装凑巧,赶在313的时候,将问题投诉到了工信部。就这,联通还在扯包子是不是两元钱一个的问题。不过总算还是给了句话,说再研究。工信部那边呢,倒是很负责任,电话给予了回复,说已经督促联通处理好这个问题。如果他们不好好处理,你也可以拿起法律武器,按照相关的法律法规,到人民法院起诉,来维护自己的合法权益。
起诉就起诉,谁怕谁呢?奈何石三生自己与市政府、国土局的诉讼还没有最后的了结。又没得孙猴子的分身术,也只好且等且看吧。好在这与政府的争讼,虽然因政府借机两会提异议说司法管辖权问题。中院依法驳回了这荒唐的理由,继续诉讼。对诉讼结果石三生已经不担心:既然已经判决了政府违法,根据国家赔偿法、物权法给受害人进行合法的赔偿自然是顺利成章的事。你政府害的我四年疲于争讼,又伪造了我的私文,又是串通基层法院立假案,还害死了我的母亲,总不能只一个违法判决就了事吧?
说到此,其实石三生真的很佩服自己:中国十三亿人民,能把个统辖八百万人口大市的市长告倒一次、还将再告倒第二次。不敢说大陆唯一,在这半岛上,一定是如那法官大人所说:是史无前例了!
既然吴邦国大人说中国特色的社会主义法律体系已经形成。我们这些身为国民的草民能做的,就是要像工信部官员所说的那样,学会拿起这经常会走火误伤自己的法律武器,亲身去体验这体系到底完美不完美。
所以,石三生是不赞成上访的!如果可能,建议国家取缔这些只会构陷了访民却很少成事的混账部门。
最后,给中国联通进一言:用户付的是肉包子钱,就该给人家肉包子,偷换成白菜包子,不但不合民法、广告法、合同法,还很缺德!